8th Annual Weight Stigma Conference


WSC 2020 abstract deadline extension

Abstract deadline extended

We will be extending the abstract submission deadline for conference sessions (workshops, seminars, symposia etc.) until Monday 17th February. Submissions for standard oral presentations are also due 17th February. Posters will be reviewed on a rolling basis. For more information and to submit an abstract, please visit stigmaconference.com

If you are interested in presenting a session but are unsure about the suitability or format, please email us and we will be happy to discuss with you.

Weight Stigma Conference Bursary Fund

For the past few years, we have been crowdfunding a bursary fund to help make the conference more accessible for people who might otherwise not be able to attend. All donations are very gratefully received. You can make a donation at:

  • https://www.gofundme.com/f/wsc2020
  • On our website homepage: stigmaconference.com
  • At time of registration. Note registration is not yet open. The WSC is a not-for-profit and registration is costed at break-even levels. We are currently finalising this year’s budget and will be able to calculate delegate costs and open registration as soon as that has been done.

FYI. Special issue of Psychology of Women Quarterly: Feminist psychology and open science – challenges and opportunities


Dear colleagues,

We are pleased to announce a forthcoming special issue of Psychology of Women Quarterly on Feminist Psychology and Open Science: Challenges and Opportunities. See below for details about the issue and information about proposals.

Background and aims

In recent years, sparked by evidence of data fraud, questionable research practices, and low rates of replicability, there has been an increased push to make psychological research more open and transparent (Shrout & Rodgers, 2018). The open science movement has diverse goals, most of which focus on increasing the validity and reproducibility of scientific research (Hesse, 2018; Nosek et al., 2015). For a variety of reasons, the introduction of open science has polarized the field and remains a controversial topic for many social scientists (see Mirowski, 2018). The unique challenges and opportunities that open science poses for feminist psychologists have yet to be systematically considered. Psychological science has historically silenced and devalued the perspectives of women and other marginalized groups (MacArthur & Shields, 2014), and the open science movement is no exception (GenderAction, 2019). Feminist psychology has long played a role in destabilizing patriarchal norms and customs in the field by challenging traditional methodologies and research practices and creating space for women’s voices and experiences (Eagly, Eaton, Rose, Riger, & McHugh, 2012). The goal of this special issue is to present a diversity of feminist psychologists’ perspectives on open science and its application to and implications for feminist psychological research.

In this special issue, we pose several questions:

  • What are the benefits and disadvantages of engaging in open science practices for feminist psychologists? What are the barriers to successfully engaging with open science, and how can we facilitate a culture in which the use of open methods is more normative? Should we?
  • Is open science a promising way forward for feminist psychology, or is it an imperative that may further silence and censor feminist psychologists?
  • In what ways do the goals of the open science movement complement or contradict the goals of feminist psychology? How might a growing emphasis on “replication” and “reproducibility” in the open science movement undermine the significance of critical feminist research, particularly qualitative methods (e.g., storytelling, participatory action research, grounded theory, phenomenology, discourse analysis)?
  • How has the open science initiative improved or challenged your own work as a feminist researcher? How can feminist psychologists integrate open science practices into their own research, perhaps in unconventional or negotiated ways?

We invite submissions to the special issue that consider these questions and related ideas on the relation between feminist psychology and open science.

Manuscript Submission

 Submissions for initial consideration should consist of detailed abstracts of 2 double-spaced pages followed by a short biography (limited to half a page) of each author. Manuscript submissions will be peer reviewed and invitation of a full paper (following abstract submission) does not guarantee publication. We encourage and will strive for a diversity of voices from feminist psychologists.

Submit detailed abstracts and biographies by April 15th, 2020, to Jaclyn Siegel at jsiegel3@uwo.ca. Questions and inquiries may also be directed to any of the other guest editors (Dr. Rachel Calogero, Dr. Asia Eaton, or Dr. Tomi-Ann Roberts). Approximately 6-10 papers will be selected for the final issue. The special issue editors plan to notify authors of selection decisions by mid-June 2020.

If your abstract results in an invitation to submit a full manuscript, completed manuscripts will be due October 15th, 2020. Manuscripts must be prepared according to the Manuscript Submission information available on the Psychology of Women Quarterly home page (https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pwq) and submitted electronically through the journal’s manuscript submission portal (https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pwq).

We look forward to reading your proposals.

Jaclyn Siegel, M.S. (jsiegel3@uwo.ca)
Rachel Calogero, Ph.D. (rcaloger@uwo.ca)
Asia Eaton, Ph.D. (aeaton@fiu.edu)
Tomi-Ann Roberts, Ph.D. (troberts@coloradocollege.edu)


Eagly, A. H., Eaton, A., Rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and Psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67(2), 211-230.

GenderAction (2019). Report on strategic advice for enhancing the gender dimension of open science and innovation policy. Retrieved from https://genderaction.eu › GENDERACTION_Report-5.1_D11_OSOI.pdf

Hesse, B. W. (2018). Can psychology walk the walk of open science? American Psychologist, 73(2), 126–137.

MacArthur, H., & Shields, S. (2014). Psychology’s Feminist Voices: A critical pedagogical tool. Sex Roles, 70(9), 431-433.

Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 171-203.

Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., & … Yarkoni, T. (2015)

Rodgers, J. L., & Shrout, P. E. (2018). Psychology’s replication crisis as scientific opportunity: A précis for policymakers.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(1), 134–141.

Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 487-510. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845

Abstract deadline reminder

Just a reminder that abstract submission for conference sessions (workshops, seminars, symposia etc.) are due one week today, on Monday 3rd February. Submissions for standard oral presentations are due 17th February. Posters will be reviewed on a rolling basis. For more information and to submit an abstract, please visit stigmaconference.com

Weight Stigma Conference Bursary Fund

For the past few years, we have been crowdfunding a bursary fund to help make the conference more accessible for people who might otherwise not be able to attend. All donations are very gratefully received. You can make a donation at:

  • https://www.gofundme.com/f/wsc2020
  • On our website homepage: stigmaconference.com
  • At time of registration. Note registration is not yet open. The WSC is a not-for-profit and registration is costed at break-even levels. We are currently finalising this year’s budget and will be able to calculate delegate costs and open registration as soon as that has been done.

Weight Stigma Conference 2020: Call for abstracts

8th Annual International Weight Stigma Conference, 22-23 June, 2020, Auckland, New Zealand

Call for abstracts:

The Annual International Weight Stigma Conference is an inter-disciplinary event that brings together scholars and practitioners from a range of backgrounds (e.g., public health, government and public policy, psychology, medicine, sociology, anthropology, allied health professions, education, sports and exercise science, social sciences, media studies, business, law, activism, and the lay public) to consider research, policy, rhetoric, and practice around the issue of weight stigma.

We are now accepting abstracts for oral presentations and posters, as well as session proposals including brief symposia, round tables, debates, and workshops. We are also interested in non-traditional submissions (e.g. media, performance, art). The two-day interdisciplinary programme will cover the entire weight stigma research spectrum – from basic, to applied, to clinical, to policy – and feature an outstanding roster of international speakers and local experts.

For more information about the conference and to submit an abstract, please visit: stigmaconference.com.

Submission deadlines: Session proposals Monday 3rd February; Oral presentations Monday 17th February; Posters will be reviewed on a rolling basis.

FYI. NSF Social Psychology Program Director Job Opportunity


The National Science Foundation (NSF) is currently recruiting a rotating Program Director for the Social Psychology Program.  The formal announcement is posted on the USAJobs website at:  https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/555014800

Rotating Program Directors at NSF typically serve for one or two years, managing a disciplinary program in their areas of expertise.  The Social Psychology Program is supported by two Program Directors.

Candidates must have a Ph.D. in Behavioral Science, plus after award of the Ph.D., six or more years of successful research, research administration, and/or managerial experience pertinent to the position.

This announcement is open to (All US Citizens OR current NSF employees) who meet citizenship and eligibility requirements.
Federal Appropriations Law requires that Non-Citizens meet certain eligibility criteria to be considered. Therefore, Non-Citizens must certify eligibility by signing and attaching this Citizenship Affidavit to their application. Non-citizens who do not provide the affidavit at the time of application will not be considered.

Relocation expenses MAY be paid contingent upon the availability of funds. NSF has determined that all of its positions are eligible for telework. Work suitable for telework depends on job duties; therefore, employees must receive approval from their supervisor for telework and have a telework agreement in place. Entering into a telework agreement is voluntary.

Salary: $142,443 to $182,627 per year

Deadline: 20 Jan 2020

More info

FYI. Fat Studies Conference, New Zealand: Call for submissions

We are so excited to be holding the 8th Annual International Weight Stigma Conference in Auckland, New Zealand in June 2020. We’ve chosen this location to coincide with the third Fat Studies Conference, hosted by Dr Cat Pausé at Massey University in Auckland. So two conferences and one holiday of a lifetime!

Call for papers for FSC is now out. See below. Call for papers for the WSC will go out in January.


Venue: Massey University, Auckland New Zealand

Date: 18-19 June, 2020

Abstract submission deadline: 15 Feb 2020

Early bird registration closes: 1 April 2020

Contact: Cat Pausé, PhD  c.pause@massey.ac.nz

We are pleased to invite papers for possible inclusion in the upcoming Fat Studies: Past, Present, Futures. This conference will provide for academics and activists to consider our fat pasts, our fat present, and our fat futures. We welcome papers and performances from academics, researchers, intellectuals, scholars, activists, and artists, in any field of study, and at any stage in their career.

Our keynotes are Professor Esther Rothblum and the founder of The Body is Not an Apology, Sonya Renee Taylor; and we expect contributors from around the world. Community events will take place the night before FSNZ20 and the closing night of FSNZ20. We encourage all attendees to plan to attend both community events (Wed, Fri), and the conference dinner (Thurs).

Fat Studies is a post-disciplinary field of study that confronts and critiques cultural constraints against notions of “fatness” and “the fat body”; explores fat bodies as they live in, are shaped by, and remake the world; and theorises how society conceptualises and pathologises fat bodies. Fat Studies scholars identify and discuss mainstream and alternative discourses on fatness, analyse size as a social justice issue at the intersection of oppression, and critically appraise size oppression as it is manifested in various societal institutions (medicine, media, education, etc).

All submissions are welcome, but please ensure your proposal fits within the academic framework of Fat Studies. Please also be mindful that Fat Studies is an academic discipline and not merely an umbrella term for all discussions of fat bodies. Additionally, we encourage submitters to rethink using words like “obesity” and “overweight” in their presentations unless they are used ironically, within quotes, or accompanied by a political analysis.

In your submission, please include the title of your paper/presentation, an abstract, a short bio, a photo, and a Twitter/Instagram hashtag if appropriate. Topics may include, but are not limited to

  • Fat Indigeneity
  • Queering fat
  • Fat histories
  • Disrupting fatness
  • Living fat
  • Biopolitics of fatness
  • Cross-cultural or global constructions of fatness and fat bodies
  • Geography and lived experience of fatness and fat bodies
  • Theoretical and methodological approaches to understanding the construction, pathologisation, and/or representations, of fatness
  • Fat futures

Abstracts should be submitted as an attachment to fsnz20@massey.ac.nz. Files should be named with the author’s surname followed by _fs2020 (Jones_fs2020). Please include contact information in the body of the email, and ensure your submission includes the title of your paper/presentation, an abstract, a short bio, a photo, and a Twitter/Instagram hashtag if appropriate. The abstracts of all work presented at the conference will be published in the conference proceedings. All presentations will be live streamed for the online audience, and will be available on demand for one year.

Activists and students are especially welcome to submit.

Informal enquiries concerning papers and topics are welcome before the deadline.

FYI. New book on stigma – Call for chapter abstract submissions


Routledge / Taylor & Francis is working with Alicia Nordstrom, Ph.D. and Wind Goodfriend, Ph.D. to create a new edited volume tentatively titled “Innovative Stigma and Discrimination Reduction Programs.” We are seeking abstract submissions from potential author contributors.

The purpose of the book is to summarize evidence-based, innovative anti-stigma programs. Importantly, the audience of potential readers is both an academic audience and a general audience of people who may implement the programs across a variety of fields (e.g., in the workplace, in schools, in communities). Thus, the language and tone of chapters will be conversational and accessible to all audiences.

We hope to include chapters that vary in (1) form of stigma (e.g., race, disability, sexual orientation, body size, SES, mental health, physical health, religion, and more) and (2) form or type of intervention (e.g., experiential, cognitive, direct contact, narrative, video or media-based).  We strongly encourage contributors from around the world to bring multicultural perspectives to this topic.

Interventions included in the book may or may not have been published in other outlets before. So, authors who have already published their intervention research in peer-reviewed journals may still contribute to this volume (but should cite that article). The book’s emphasis is both academic and practical. Chapters will follow this general structure:

  • Introduction (1-2 paragraphs), followed by headers/sections including (1) “Theoretical background” [specific to your form of stigma and form of intervention], (2) “Our intervention” [describe your intervention in detail, like a “how to” guide], (3) “Evidence it works and limitations” [present research results on effectiveness as well as potential intervention barriers], and (4) “References/List of further readings.”

Contributors will not be paid for their chapter, but each author or author team will receive one free copy of the final book (one free copy per chapter).

Authors interested in contributing to the volume should submit an abstract (approximately 500 words plus relevant references). Abstract submissions are due by January 1, 2020. Authors will be notified whether their chapter has been accepted for the book by January 31, with first drafts due by May 1, 2020. Chapters will be between 3500-5500 words long. Approximately 15 chapters will be included in the book.

Please send your abstracts or questions to both Dr. Alicia Nordstrom (anordstrom@misericordia.edu) and to Dr. Wind Goodfriend (goodfriend@bvu.edu).

FYI. ESRC New Investigator Grants


ESRC New Investigator Grants

We are pleased to invite proposals for our New Investigator Grants. New Investigator Grants form one element of our support for early career researchers and the scheme is specifically aimed at supporting those looking to make the transition to an independent researcher through managing their first major research project. These grants replace our Future Research Leaders scheme.

The call is open to high-quality candidates from anywhere in the world who have a maximum of four years’ postdoctoral experience and the support of an eligible UK research organisation. Grants ranging from £100,000 to £300,000 full Economic Cost (fEC) can be awarded.

Proposals are welcomed across the full disciplinary range of the social sciences and at the interface with the wider sciences, however the social sciences must represent at least 50 per cent of the research focus and effort.

The call will operate alongside ESRC’s Research Grants open call and you can submit proposals at any time – there are no fixed closing dates. We aim to announce the majority of decisions within 26 weeks of receiving the proposal although we cannot guarantee this, since it is dependent on receiving sufficient good quality peer review comments within the necessary timescale.

More info

FYI. BSA 2020 – Reimagining Social Bodies: Self, Institutions and Societies


British Sociological Association 2020 Annual Conference

Reimagining Social Bodies: Self, Institutions and Societies
21–23 April 2020

Aston University, Birmingham, UK

The theme for the 2020 Annual Conference is – Reimagining Social Bodies: Self, Institutions and Societies.  The conference will take place at Aston University, Birmingham from 21–23 April 2020.

We are delighted to announce our confirmed Plenary Speakers are:

  • Susan Halford, University of Bristol (BSA President)
  • Monica G Moreno Figueroa, University of Cambridge
  • Austerity Panel: Sylvia Walby, City University of London (Chair); Akwugo Emejulu, University of Warwick; Kayleigh Garthwaite, University of Birmingham; Guy Standing, SOAS University of London; Wanda Wyporska, The Equality Trust

The body has an interesting and contested role in sociological thinking and research. At times it has been seen as irrelevant to understanding key issues of structure and social positioning; while at other times framed as central to thinking about dynamics of interaction, identity formation and practices of regulation and control. In contrast, in contemporary examinations of the body a core agenda is to bring together questions of the everyday, with understanding key societal issues around how citizenship, entitlement, boundaries, marginalisation and exclusion operate. Therefore, ‘the body’ is currently examined in a multitude of ways and is itself pluralised to engage with the importance of thinking about varied types and understandings of what constitutes and distinguishes diverse bodies. Bodies are being explored in order to think about many aspects of the impact of inequalities, institutions, cultural practices, social values and norms, and discriminatory dynamics on individuals and groups.

Contemporary explorations of bodies generate a broad range of potential thematic questions for the conference in 2020. These include, but are not restricted to: What role are bodies playing in current disputes over who is a citizen in different global locations and who has the right to cross state boundaries? Does the concept of the ‘social body’ retain validity in contexts of fragmented identities and fractured ties to the state? Looking at issues such as disability and age, how important are bodies as vehicles for citizenship rights and welfare entitlement? What do contemporary disputes over gender and the body say about the intersection of medical, scientific and political classifications in establishing legitimate bodies’? In what ways do bodies play into intersectional dynamics of inequality and marginalisation? How important are bodies in understanding some of the costs of long-term austerity?

The BSA Annual Conference is the primary annual conference for sociology in the UK with opportunities for everyone connected to the discipline.

More info


FYI. CFP: Special Issue of Fat Studies on Public Health and Healthism


Call for Proposals: Special Issue of Fat Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society on Public Health and Healthism

Fatness has been and still is seen as a major Public Health problem on a global scale – an understanding that contributes much to the discrimination and social exclusion of fat people and has led to a plethora of Public Health campaigns, programs and government measures to change people’s lifestyles and reduce the weight of populations. Simultaneously, a part of the Public Health community stresses the harmful effects of fat stigma, recognizing it as an independent health threat and proposes a focus on fitness rather than on weight loss.

While the community disputes the right strategy to better public health, others have pointed to the pervasiveness and normativity of health as a modern ideal. At a time when the boundaries of health become increasingly blurred, being healthy and constantly seeking health  and wellbeing is regarded as a prime ability of citizenship. Therefore, healthism does not only encourage moral evaluations of bodily self-conduct and legitimize interventions into fat people’s bodies and lives. It also forms a normative ideal that seems ineluctable in fat-positive communities as well. Who would not want to be healthy, not only with regard to citizenship recognition but also with regard to individual wellbeing and the absence of pain and ailment?

This special issue of Fat Studies on Public Health and Healthism seeks to discuss the conundrum of health and offer an interdisciplinary look at the nexus of health and fatness in Public Health discourses and practices, with a particular focus on the consequences of healthism for fat people and possible responses to it

Proposed topics might include, but are not limited to:

–    Historical and contemporary practices of evaluating health and fatness

–    Health Care bias and lacking access to health care for fat people

–    “Globesity” and the effect of healthism on development policies and making a global order

–    Negative health effects of fat stigma

–    Alternatives to the current treatment of fat bodies by the Public Health community

–    Health at Every Size, and definitions and practices of health that do not focus on weight-loss

–    Realignment of the right to health and the right to fatness

–    Critiques of health as a normative ideal

Guest Editors:

Friedrich Schorb, University of Bremen, Germany, schorb@uni-bremen.de

Nina Mackert, University of Leipzig, Germany, nina.mackert@uni-leipzig.de

with the Scientific Network (DFG) “Fat Studies: Doing, Becoming and Being Fat.”


To be included in this special issue, please send a 300-400 word proposal and a current CV to both guest editors by February 1, 2020. Any questions should be emailed to the guest editors.

Contributors will be notified of the status of their proposal by March 1, 2020. Full manuscripts, including all notes and references, should be between 3,000 and 5,500 words and will be due by July 1, 2020. If you wish to include reproductions of visual images with your article, please provide documentation of permission to do so from the artists/copyright holders of the image(s). All authors will need to sign a form that transfers copyright of their article to the publisher, Taylor & Francis / Routledge.

Fat Studies is the first academic journal in the field of scholarship that critically examines theory, research, practices, and programs related to body weight and appearance. Content includes original research and overviews exploring the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, sexuality, age, ability, and socioeconomic status. Articles critically examine representations of fat in health and medical sciences, the Health at Every Size model, the pharmaceutical industry, psychology, sociology, cultural studies, legal issues, literature, pedagogy, art, theater, popular culture, media studies, and activism.

Fat Studies is an interdisciplinary, international field of scholarship that critically examines societal attitudes and practices about body weight and appearance. Fat Studies advocates equality for all people regardless of body size. It explores the way fat people are oppressed, the reasons why, who benefits from that oppression and how to liberate fat people from oppression. Fat Studies seeks to challenge and remove the negative associations that society has about fat and the fat body. It regards weight, like height, as a human characteristic that varies widely across any population. Fat Studies is similar to academic disciplines that focus on race, ethnicity, gender, or age.